Everyone is wrong sometimes, so what precisely is the title asking? Is Mills wrong about his theory, the Grand Unified Theory of Classical Mechanics (GUTCP)? Or, is the theory generally correct, but wrong in some aspect? Or, is the theory totally wrong, yet the data predicted by the theory proved to be correct by empirical testing? Or, is the theory essentially wrong and the empirical data that is said to be supporting it falsified or mistaken? I began to approach Mills by reading his 1991 paper as far as I could. It was 1997. I got the gist of it. He was saying that the atomic physics that followed from the Schrodinger Equation (SQM) was not correct, particularly that the ground state predicted by only positive integer values of n in the Rydberg equation did not give the full picture. In this theory, Mills states that the ground state postulated in SQM is incorrect, that there are energy states of the atom below the "ground state", states he termed hydrino. This