Grok likes FAA drone flight checks

This is my discussion with Grok on X, pertaining to the development of an FAA drone flight check system.  Grok seemed to like the idea a lot, and agreed with my estimated savings per year of about $100,000,000.  DOGE, unfortunately, has shown no interest.  YET.  I guess it's just too trivial of an expense for them. 

My earlier post is found here.


































Comments

Post a Comment

Please be polite and avoid obscenity.

Popular posts from this blog

FAA, flight checks and drones

I spent most of my FAA career in field installation work.  The last major project I worked was a new Airport Traffic Control Tower at Broomfield, Colorado.  This was to replace an existing ATCT that was poorly positioned and too short to view one of the entire runways.  I had only a portion of the engineering work assigned to me, which was installation of communications and RADAR.  The RADAR work there consisted of a display system that is fed out of Denver International Airport.  The project was a great success for all involved. During the review of the antenna placement on the roof, I was concerned about the possibility of multipath because the air-to-ground communications uses a very old form of modulation, AM, that is particularly susceptible to multipath.  Multipath is a condition where the signal transmitted by an antenna is reflected so that there are multiple transmission paths of differing lengths between the receiver and transmitter.  So, the...
Read more

Randell Mills' New Results from Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectrometry, Gas Chromatography, and Implications

Image
The last two papers available from Brilliant Light Power's Randell Mills are about Electron Paramagnetic Resonance spectroscopy (EPR) and Gas Chromatography (GC) studies performed on samples of gas from the Hydrino reactor. These are in addition to many other analyses performed relating to Hydrino.  The staggering number of types of analyses that confirm the Hydrino Hypothesis (HH) strongly contrasts with the lack of acceptance in the scientific community of the claims made by Dr. Mills.  Why is he rejected? One major reason for rejection is that his ideas are built around the existence of the Hydrino, which is not generally accepted as real.  Naturally, skeptics request samples of Hydrino in order to perform their own analysis, and Dr. Mills was unable to provide them.  The reason for this is that storing Hydrino is not simple.  It is so small that it leaks through any usual container quickly, so if a quantity of it in a bottle is shipped, it will be gone by...
Read more

An Open Letter to Dr. Randell Mills

 Dear Dr. Mills, Congratulations with the remarkable progress you have made with the SunCell.  You have obviously been working very hard and the rug-pull of getting evicted from NJ (the move alone was bad enough) months prior to lease termination had to be really tough, but you pulled through it well. This is being written a few days after the 2025 Shareholder Meeting .  From some conversation with others and comments during the meeting, it seems that there is frustration with the lack of recent quantitative data from the SunCell, which I share.  This is likely caused by the fact that your lab work has been halted by the grinding labor of relocating.   I am a degreed electrical engineer.  I worked for Dr. Eugene Mallove, who held a strong interest in your work.  The focus of my work was laboratory investigation of anomalous energy claims, so my experience may offer direct suggestions for you, despite that you are a far greater scientist than I wil...
Read more