Dr. Robert Malone
My doctor diagnosed me with COVID before there were vaccines available. I treated myself with nutritional therapy. I was fortunate to see Dr. Pierre Kory on YouTube before that got censored. Kory was making a passionate appeal to Congress to investigate the clinical use of the very commonly prescribed drug Ivermectin in the treatment of COVID, at all phases of the disease progression.
Project Veritas recently published a report on DARPA documents pertaining to COVID research: "Major Murphy’s report goes on to detail great concern over the COVID-19 gain of function program, the concealment of documents, the suppression of potential curatives, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines."
In my experience, the efficacy of Ivermectin against COVID is well established. My doctor prescribed it to me and the first dose resulted in a life renewing experience. Several progressing symptoms were gone or sharply diminished within hours. The campaign of disinformation against Ivermectin, as Dr. Malone describes, is very obvious.
What does this have to do with Randell Mills and hydrinos? Nothing directly. Like several other posts in this blog, I am trying to make clear the possibility of techniques of suppression and disinformation against Mills. All of them are supported by my direct experience, so I am not easily dissuaded from my general conclusions.
Following is from Malone's substack.
Remember those Johns Hopkins Pandemic war games that occurred over the span of decades? Where the outcome usually ended in a need to control the populace, by which behavioral modification techniques are used to enforce cooperation from the populace. Right now, one can wander over to Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security and see their current projects include an analysis of “anti-misinformation actions'“, which they call the Environment of Misinformation. World
leaders, governments, big media, big pharma and tech giants are busy
planning out the next pandemic response. So, maybe it is time for those
of us who believe there is a better way to live than to be controlled,
to plan out responses to all these draconian measures. As well as to
begin to develop counter measures to a bio-threat that do not use
censorship, propaganda, mandates and behavioral modification techniques.
You know, the old fashioned way where the government relies on people
to use their own critical thinking skills to assess what is best for
themselves and their families, after getting all the information
available. Definition: psyops (From the US Department of Defense)
The US Department of Defense (DOD) 2004 and 2010 Counterinsurgency Operations Reports define “psyops” as the following:
Read that last sentence again. “Behavioral change is at the root of the psyop mission.” Sound familiar? At the heart of a psyops operations are behavioral tools or mind control techniques such as hypnosis, mass formation, censorship, security theater, use of fear to drive anxiety and propaganda. How does our military use psyops?
And now - for the fly in the toilet… One of the best examples of “nudging, is the use of a “fly” in the toilet bowl. First introduced at Schiphol airport in Amsterdam back in 1999, the idea was simple: etch the image of a fly in the urinal and men will aim for it almost every time, that is - well over 80% of the time. Costs of clean-up went way down, without forcing anyone to do anything. Now
that the term nudging and pysops are defined and understood, think
about these terms in context of mass formation and the narrative big
media generated to the Joe Rogan podcast (link at the end of this
article). The article below explains:
So, the expert opinion that fact-checked the term Mass Formation is actually is an expert on the use of behavioral techniques and fear to ensure compliance within a population to support public health. So, denying that mass formation exists, while writing about it in the scientific literature. It doesn’t get more Orwellian, does it?
Frank Gaffney, Jr. This is full on political warfare, which is effectively using social and MSM media to control the narrative. But this is asymmetric warfare. They have the resources, the power, the money, main stream media, big pharma, tech giants and social media supporting their efforts. When Biden decided by executive order to enforce mandates, which are political in nature (the science does not support mandates as the vaccines do not stop spread of the disease and may create vaccine escape mutants), then mandates became a censored topic. When the government decided that they would not support the use of ivermectin and HCQ, despite our laws that allow such usage, these also became censored topics and taboo to discus. Messages about ivermectin being dangerous and horse-paste were planted though out the Internet and TV. These are examples of censorship and propaganda. Now, there is a small, but growing guerrilla army of supporters. Mostly on the conservative side. Strangely enough, the resistance has come from the conservatives and now many in the younger generation are taking up the mantle. Indications are that it is becoming hip to be conservative. Will the democrats lose the next generation because of their draconian public health responses to COVID-19? However, if the resistance speaks too loudly or speaks truth to power too often, they are taken out by warnings and de-platforming. They are losing their right to free speech. Evan some conservative politicians are no longer allowed to use such platforms are youtube or twitter. Senator Ron Johnson, the ranking member for the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations has lost the right to publish on Youtube. That should scare and shock anyone with a thinking brain. Articles on such subjects as the lab leak are removed from search engines and are not allowed to be republished by the Trusted News Initiative. Professional are losing their jobs, being investigated and are losing their licenses for speaking out and/or treating patients with COVID-19 early in the course of the disease. Some might call these tactics defenestration. As this happens, more and more people are realizing that our very freedoms that made our country what it is are at stake. The article linked below in the Telegraph shows that governments have gone beyond nudging, and are working in the realm of pysops and totalitarian measures: More recently, one of the largest newspapers in Denmark is apologizing for its journalistic failure during COVID-19, for only publishing the official government narrative without question. This newspaper continued to go along with this plan long after it was clear that the government narrative was crumbling. The link between governments and the media to control the population has become normalized. Another very timely article to read is: Professor Ehud Qimron: “Ministry of Health, it’s time to admit failure” Where as a nation, as a society and as individuals do we go from here? For me, this is a battle that has completely changed my life, my way of thinking and my perspective on my government and world leaders. There is no going back for me. I will not let this great nation, this world go down the road of totalitarianism. That is a recipe for the end of the American dream. “Inspired” did another video on my audio made from my recent interview on the Kristi Leigh TV. The video above was produced by Kristin & Jean Nolan, the founders of the Inspired Channel. I owe them a huge thank you! Watch the full interview on the Joe Rogan Experience 👉🏽
You’re a free subscriber to Who is Robert Malone. For the full experience, become a paid subscriber. |
Joe Rogan did an interview with Dr. Peter A. McCullough, a noted cardiologist in the DFW Metroplex area awhile back as well. McCullough says he has experienced some 'pushback' from those in the medical field but he continues on undeterred.
ReplyDelete1747#– Dr. Peter A. McCullough | Joe Rogan Experience
December 15, 2021
https://podcastnotes.org/joe-rogan-experience/1747-dr-peter-a-mccullough-joe-rogan-experience/
The "Key Takeaways" -
o We are not attempting to treat COVID-19 at home to prevent hospitalizations and deaths as an outcome
o Early treatment of COVID-19 is the key to survival because you take the edge off viral replication, reduce inflammation, and prevent thrombosis
o 50-85% of COVID-19 deaths could have been avoided if we adopted early treatment
o “The 800,000 deaths we have right now, I can tell you to a one they’ve received either no or inadequate early treatment.” – Dr. Peter A. McCullough
o “We’ve had a giant loss of life…It seems to me early on there was an intentional, very comprehensive suppression of treatment in order to promote fear, suffering, isolation, hospitalization, and death. It seemed to be completely organized and intentional in order to create acceptance for and promote mass vaccination.” – Dr. Peter A. McCullough
o If this was just about COVID (instead of power) we would’ve seen four pillars to the response: reduce the spread of infection, early treatment, improvement of hospital treatments with monthly updates from officials, vaccination (it has a role but not the silver bullet)
o Reputable hospitals (e.g., Harvard) STILL do not have COVID-19 treatment protocols
o Vaccines are a piece of the puzzle but are not treatment
o While most people are going to be fine, the vaccine has caused death and adverse outcomes in organ systems for a large number of people with higher susceptibility
o A young boy is more likely to be hospitalized of myocarditis post-vaccination than ever be hospitalized from COVID-19 respiratory illness
o We are not transparent on vaccines: we should be regularly reviewing safety, revisiting efficacy, and creating a profile of who it is or isn’t recommended for
o COVID-19 false narratives: asymptomatic spread & testing, you can get COVID repeatedly, take a vaccine every 6 months, you should still wear a mask if you had and recovered from COVID, vaccines are fully FDA approved
o A person is not science! Science is ever-changing and evolves with better and more well-informed data
o The idea that people in positions of authority are presenting information without a fair balance of risk versus benefit is a dangerous precedent
------------------------------------
PS. I had the Covid in Sept-Aug 2020 timeframe, recovered, have a story to tell, but not at this juncture. Unvaccinated (and will remain so) at present. My RN sister has been 'red-pilled' by this train wreck our govt foisted upon us too. She too remains unvaccinated and steadfastly too.
Nice summary. Congratulations on avoiding whatever this "vaccine" is.
ReplyDelete